Home | Help | Site Map | Contact Us
Divorce Support Forums: going back to court:
How to Win Child Custody How to Win Child Custody ($74.95)
This book is for people who are in the middle of a custody dispute or feel as though there is a possibility of one in the future.

Available by Mail or Download

You are not logged in.
[Login]
[Register Here]
Main Index · Search Forums · Active Topics
New User Registration · Who's Online · FAQ · Calendar

General Forums >> Custody and Visitation
Previous topic Previous   View all topics Index   Next topic Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
one1two2three3
New


Reged: 06/20/08
Posts: 3
going back to court:
      #213342 - 06/20/08 11:39 AM (192.249.47.8)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

Almost two years ago, my ex and I had a very quick, inexpensive divorce, where he readily agreed to me having sole custody, and him getting visitation every-other weekend from Saturday am till Sunday 8pm (which he always cuts 2-3 hours short), two weeks in February (this year he took his girlfriend to Belize instead), and the ability to visit them in my home on Christmas day (which he never has done). About six months after the divorce, he called DCF and made false claims of abuse against me (which were thoroughly investigated and found to be unsubstantiated), six months after that he let the girls take my husband's last name (who has raised them since they were 2 months and 20 months), and now is spending all sorts of money to take me back to court to change the original agreement.
Anyway, I was thinking about my ex-husbands list of demands (that I just got from my attorney) and I was wondering if you guys thought my responses were reasonable and if it appears that either he or I are not looking at the best interest of the children. Let's discuss:

Demand #1: Joint legal custody. Our response: No way Jose. The main reason for this is because when we first got divorced, he gave that up pretty readily. And since then, he's let the girls take pete's last name, which pretty clearly indicates he is okay with schools, doctors, etc not readily recognizing him as a father...and therefore wasn't anticipating trying to get involved in those aspects of his life. He is pretty irresponsible and since I'm the one who is going to miss work when they're sick, etc, so I feel I've earned the right to be the primary decision maker. We wouldn't have had more children if we'd thought he'd have the ability to weigh in on decisions (like what religion they are) that would undoubtedly affect our new son too.


Demand #2: Have his weekend start Friday at 5pm instead of Saturday at 8am. Our response: No, no, no.

The problem that I have with the Friday night business is that if I have sole legal custody, I need Friday night with them to make sure they get their homework for the weekend done. I don't even get off work till 5 (and neither does he, in his busy season he gets off much later) so I have no idea why he thinks the girls would be available for pick up then. That is one less family dinner, one less bed time story, you get the idea. When the girls are older and want to participate in track, cheerleading, whatever, they are going to have practices and things on weeknights and I don't want him to ruin their chances of having a childhood with the extra curricular activities they decide to participate in.

Demand #3: Have us share in the transportation. We said fine. He can pick them up 8am our house on Saturday, and me or Pete can pick them up at 5pm his house on Sunday (which shaves time off his visitation) because we would need to get them home in time to feed them and bathe them before bedtime.

Demand #4: He said he wanted time on either the 24th, 25th, or 26th of December. We said, sure, you can have them from noon until 6pm on the 26th.

The reasoning behind this is when we were divorced, he gave me the entire Christmas break holiday with the ability to visit the children in my home on Christmas day (which he has never exercised). And, I had more children based on the agreement we were already following. I wouldn't have had a third child if I thought he was going to be waking up on his own on Christmas morning. Granted I only celebrate the pagan aspects of holidays, but there is still a lot of fun traditions associated with them. I've got pretty fond memories of going out shopping for door busters on the day after Christmas with my mom, too. They are girls, they should have that.

Demand #5: He said he wanted them during Christmas and winter breaks (end of February) every year. We said, you can have them for Dec 27th-29th on one year, and then 3 days during Winter break (excluding Nash's birthday) the following year. We're already at 4 1/2 extra days a now.

This only provides him with 2 extra overnights a year, which is a good thing for me to keep limited if he takes me to court again.

Demand #6: To claim the children on the tax exemptions every other year. Our response: hahaha.

He is griping about missing out on a $1 or 2K bonus last year when he's been paying the last two years of child support based on an income that is significantly less than what it really is. We're the ones having to set up house and home for them. We are re-setting up the child support based off his true salary from last year ($78K) as opposed to his draw-off-commission number (45K).

Demand #7: To have the children's social security numbers. Our response: No, no, no.

My take on this is what for? To do tax fraud? Put them on his insurance and then try to take them to doctors and convince them I'm abusing the kids? He's already harrassed me in the past with false claims of abuse to DCF. No, no, no.

Demand #8: To rotate every other Easter and Thanksgiving. My response: I want them their birthdays, their half-brother's b-day, My husband's birthday, my birthday, Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter, 4th of July, St Patrick's day, Halloween, and Valentine's day, and mother's day. If his weekend falls on one of these, he gets the next two weekends in a row (so I'm not getting any extra days by having these and they don't normally fall on a weekend anyway). He gets: Memorial day, Father's day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Labor Day, and Martin Luther King day from 8am until 6pm. These always fall on Mondays, which he has never had before, so for him it's pure "extra" days.

I wouldn't have had a third child if I thought he was going to be hunting for easter eggs on his own on easter morning. I have taken both the girls to the Macy's parade every year since they've been born (Harper has been to four). When it comes to things like Halloween and 4th of July, when they are older their friends (who undoubtedly will live near me) will have halloween parties or want to trick or treat together and I don't want them to miss out.

I doubt he'll ever be able to get those off work, so I'm not sweating it.

Now, we're at 9 1/2-10 1/2 extra days a year (depending on where Father's day falls on a weekend he would already have them).

Demand #9: To have me "return" a bunch of personal paperwork of his that I never had (primarily because he never had it either). Why would I have a copy of his dad's death certificate if he never did?

Demand #10: To tell him if we're going to move. The last time I checked, we were legally obligated to do that anyway. And, we'd have a good enough reason to move he wouldn't be able to stop us anyway, so sure, why not.

Demand #11: To not allow the girls to call my husband "Dad" and to force the girls to call their biological father "dad." Our response: HAHAHA. He has raised them since they were 2 months and 20 months old. He has earned the title.

Demand #12: To have first right of refusal. So, let's say I'm away because I'm traveling for business or personal reasons. That means if he fancies, he can come take the kids away and keep them at his house (even if it means pulling them out of school for a week or having his girlfriend watch them the majority of the time). Our response: You must be kidding. If this is the type of crap you pull after you get jealous cuz I go to NZ, we are never doing anything where we have to notify you of where I am.

This is primarily because when I travel I still think the siblings should all three still be together, go to school, and these are the opportunities they have to spend with my parents who will come to my house to stay with them. They need to know their grandparents.

Demand #13: His busy time at work is during the summer. He wants two extra weeks of visitation to be at his discretion for when to exercise them. Our response: Tough sh*t. There is this little thing called SCHOOL. We said that he could have one week in early July (excepting 4th of July) and one week at end of August . Not consecutive. With dates to be confirmed by April 1st. His two weeks are to include a weekend he would normally have (in other words, he can't give dates for a week that starts on a Wed and ends on a Tues, including a weekend he isn't scheduled for and wind up with 3 weekends in a row). His weeks in July and August are to be at least four weeks apart so we can plan our own family vacation .

This also keep his consecutive nights limited to a max of six which would help me if he tries to take me back to court again. I'd like the summer visits to start in 2009 so that he isn't rewarded for not taking the two weeks in 2008 that he was supposed to take with them and decided to take his girlfriend on Belize instead.

Demand #14: He wants phone visitation during the week. We said sure. From 7:00-7:15pm on Wednesdays, he can talk to both girls on speakerphone with us present. I doubt they'll really pay much attention to the fact he is on the phone, but it's either that or give the phone to the girls so they can be in tears fighting over who gets to hold it and constantly hanging it up. The kids are 2 and 3 years old.

Demand #15: To have the girls for two weekends in a row in between every weekend that I get them. Our response: HAHAHA.

We also put:

If he is 10 minutes late picking them up without calling, he forgoes the visitation. If we got to pick them up and they aren't there, 10 minutes late without calling and his next visitation is forgoed. All visitation is use it or lose it. We're also putting into the legal agreement that he is to provide the children with a vegetarian diet only. And also that if he takes me back to court again, that if I win, he pays my legal fees. We also said he is not to fly or take the girls out of New England. This is primariy because of the types of friends he has in Seattle.

So, are his requests (from someone who agreed to very limited visitation originally and doesn't have a great track record of taking what he has, let me change the girls last names, made false claims to dcf and also lives an hour away) seem outlandish or not in the best interest of the kids? What about my responses?

Knowing guys like him, do you think he'll know to stop when he is ahead, or am I going to court?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mistake#2
Platinum
***

Reged: 07/19/06
Posts: 3268
Loc: Florida
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213417 - 06/20/08 02:06 PM (167.127.163.143)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

[quote]Demand #1: Joint legal custody.

**Not worth the fight...mainly gives him access to records. My ex and I have this, yet I make ALL the necessary decisions due to his lack of involvement.

Demand #2: Have his weekend start Friday at 5pm instead of Saturday at 8am.

**I think that he can/should be responsible for school work also. Make it part of the agreement and that if he doesn't hold his end that the visitation will revert back.


Demand #3: Have us share in the transportation. We said fine. He can pick them up 8am our house on Saturday, and me or Pete can pick them up at 5pm his house on Sunday (which shaves time off his visitation) because we would need to get them home in time to feed them and bathe them before bedtime.

**How much time is being shaved off and how far does he live? Can't he feed & bathe them first?

Demand #4: He said he wanted time on either the 24th, 25th, or 26th of December. We said, sure, you can have them from noon until 6pm on the 26th.

**That's unreasonable...why shouldn't he get a share in the holiday? Just because he let you have it before doesn't mean that he shouldn't get any time now. Alternate Christmas Eve & Christmas day. I would refuse to visit my kids in my ex's home at anytime...and especially if they were this unreasonable. He should be able to make memories with the kids too, your memories don't supercede his rights. Nor does shopping with grandma.

Demand #5: He said he wanted them during Christmas and winter breaks (end of February) every year.

**He should get half of Christmas break and every other spring break...shouldn't he get a chance to spend the vacation time with the kids too?

This only provides him with 2 extra overnights a year, which is a good thing for me to keep limited if he takes me to court again.

**Why? Are you concerned about your child support amount or something?

Demand #6: To claim the children on the tax exemptions every other year. Our response: hahaha.

**This is pretty standard to either claim kids every other year or to be able to claim one child per year. Whether or not you think his support is efficient, that should be done by state guidelines and not deviated from. He does need to have a place for them to sleep and eat while he has them doesn't he?

Demand #7: To have the children's social security numbers. Our response: No, no, no.
***Why not? It's his right as a parent to have that information, he may need it for life insurance purposes or to set up a savings account for them...it's information that he has a right to have.



Demand #8: To rotate every other Easter and Thanksgiving. My response: I want them their birthdays, their half-brother's b-day, My husband's birthday, my birthday, Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter, 4th of July, St Patrick's day, Halloween, and Valentine's day, and mother's day. If his weekend falls on one of these, he gets the next two weekends in a row (so I'm not getting any extra days by having these and they don't normally fall on a weekend anyway). He gets: Memorial day, Father's day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Labor Day, and Martin Luther King day from 8am until 6pm. These always fall on Mondays, which he has never had before, so for him it's pure "extra" days.

**Your being unreasonable.

Demand #9: To have me "return" a bunch of personal paperwork of his that I never had (primarily because he never had it either). Why would I have a copy of his dad's death certificate if he never did?

**He can go to the county clerks office and get the death certificate himself...this has no place in custody issues.

Demand #10: To tell him if we're going to move. The last time I checked, we were legally obligated to do that anyway. And, we'd have a good enough reason to move he wouldn't be able to stop us anyway, so sure, why not.

Demand #11: To not allow the girls to call my husband "Dad" and to force the girls to call their biological father "dad." Our response: HAHAHA. He has raised them since they were 2 months and 20 months old. He has earned the title.

**Whether he has earned the title or not shouldn't matter, but this is a pointless demand and the kids should call stepdad whatever they feel comfortable with and real dad should get over it.

Demand #12: To have first right of refusal. So, let's say I'm away because I'm traveling for business or personal reasons. That means if he fancies, he can come take the kids away and keep them at his house (even if it means pulling them out of school for a week or having his girlfriend watch them the majority of the time). Our response: You must be kidding. If this is the type of crap you pull after you get jealous cuz I go to NZ, we are never doing anything where we have to notify you of where I am.

This is primarily because when I travel I still think the siblings should all three still be together, go to school, and these are the opportunities they have to spend with my parents who will come to my house to stay with them. They need to know their grandparents.

**First right of refusal would mean that HE is taking care of the kids, not his girlfriend. He should not be able to take them out of school, period. The grandparents rights don't supercede the fathers rights...

Demand #13: His busy time at work is during the summer. He wants two extra weeks of visitation to be at his discretion for when to exercise them. Our response: Tough sh*t. There is this little thing called SCHOOL. We said that he could have one week in early July (excepting 4th of July) and one week at end of August . Not consecutive. With dates to be confirmed by April 1st. His two weeks are to include a weekend he would normally have (in other words, he can't give dates for a week that starts on a Wed and ends on a Tues, including a weekend he isn't scheduled for and wind up with 3 weekends in a row). His weeks in July and August are to be at least four weeks apart so we can plan our own family vacation .

**It's not reasonable for him to take kids during school year because it's more convenient...it is reasonable for you to ask for specific dates in writing by a certain date so that you may plan your summer as well.

This also keep his consecutive nights limited to a max of six which would help me if he tries to take me back to court again.

**Your mentioning this again...why are you concerned with this?

Demand #14: He wants phone visitation during the week. We said sure. From 7:00-7:15pm on Wednesdays, he can talk to both girls on speakerphone with us present. I doubt they'll really pay much attention to the fact he is on the phone, but it's either that or give the phone to the girls so they can be in tears fighting over who gets to hold it and constantly hanging it up. The kids are 2 and 3 years old.
**Kids that age are hard to speak to on the phone, but the amount of time you are offering is ridiculous anyhow.

Demand #15: To have the girls for two weekends in a row in between every weekend that I get them. Our response: HAHAHA.

**His request here is not reasonable.

We also put:

If he is 10 minutes late picking them up without calling, he forgoes the visitation. If we got to pick them up and they aren't there, 10 minutes late without calling and his next visitation is forgoed. All visitation is use it or lose it.

**Standard time is 20-30 minutes - not 10...and doesn't apply to the future visitation. Your unreasonable in requesting this.

We're also putting into the legal agreement that he is to provide the children with a vegetarian diet only.

**Why?

And also that if he takes me back to court again, that if I win, he pays my legal fees.

We also said he is not to fly or take the girls out of New England. This is primariy because of the types of friends he has in Seattle.

**You can't control his life or his time with the kids.

So, are his requests (from someone who agreed to very limited visitation originally and doesn't have a great track record of taking what he has, let me change the girls last names, made false claims to dcf and also lives an hour away) seem outlandish or not in the best interest of the kids? What about my responses?

Knowing guys like him, do you think he'll know to stop when he is ahead, or am I going to court? [/quote]

Honestly, I think you are extremely UNREASONABLE. Your not thinking in the best interest of your kids, instead you are trying to punish their father for his past bad acts and it's all about YOU YOU YOU. At their ages of 2 & 3, they should have more of an opportunity to get to know their father...and you are obviously not willing to provide that opportunity. If you aren't more reasonable than he SHOULD bring you to court and he probably will win a lot more just because of your stubbornness and inability to try to co-parent.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JenH03
Platinum
**

Reged: 02/07/08
Posts: 227
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213449 - 06/20/08 02:38 PM (75.84.56.35)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

I had a response all typed out and it got deleted. Darn.

Anyhow, I'll summarize what I tried to type before. I think you are being unreasonable with most of the requests. He wants pretty much the standard visitation and he'll probably get it, unless he is a proven child molestor or danger to the kids. Your holiday schedule right now is clearly one sided and truthfully sucks for him, I can see why he wants more. You get all the "good" holidays and he gets the "bank" ones. Consider this: the court may ask you if you think your holiday agreement is fair, and if you say yes, then they'll ask you if YOU would accept it, which I doubt you would. Your reasons for denying him in sharing the holidays are really petty. The court isn't going to care that your son has to hunt for Easter eggs alone, this is about your daughters and their dad, not you and your son.

It seems to me like you're trying to cut the girls' dad out of their lives, and that isn't fair. He may have given you sole custody 2 years ago, but you should have known at the time that custody is never set in stone, it's always modifyable and the fact that you state you wouldn't have had more children if you thought you'd have to share your daughters with their father is both naive and selfish.

Courts like to see parents working together. They like to see them facilitating the relationship between the other parent and kids. You don't seem to want to do that so a court may find you uncooperative. As the custodial parent, especially because your girls are so young, it is your job to try to foster a relationship between them and their dad, since they are too young right now to do it themselves. When they are older, they will make their own decision about their dad, but it isn't solely your choice to decide at this point what kind of relationship that is now. Your children deserve to know their real father, and he deserves to know them, it's not fair that you apparently have picked them a new dad because you didn't want to be married to theirs anymore.

An unfortunate part of divorce is having to share your kids with someone you'd rather not have in your own life anymore. It's tough but that's the way it goes. You need to put aside your own opinions of your ex and realize that this man will always be their dad. He may have allowed you to change your girls' last name but he didn't sign his rights away.

Your custody agreement is only two years old, not ten, and your ex didn't abandon them. Maybe giving you sole custody was a mistake, maybe he didn't understand his rights at the time, or maybe, like a lot of men, he felt defeated from the beginning, got some bad advice and took what he thought he would be awarded, knowing that men often get screwed in custody fights. Or maybe he's the worst man on earth and deserves nothing, but the bottom line is that isn't for you to decide.

My advice to you is to try to work with him, and keep it out of court if you can. Try to come to an agreement, but you're going to have to be a little more flexible than you sound, because not all of his requests are unreasonable.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mistake#2
Platinum
***

Reged: 07/19/06
Posts: 3268
Loc: Florida
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213451 - 06/20/08 02:40 PM (167.127.163.143)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

I just realized some of your argument of him not taking the kids during certain times was due to school...but then you went on to say they were 2 & 3 years old? The kids aren't in school yet and there should be no reason why he shouldn't have extended time with him until they reach school age which includes summer breaks vs time during the winter.
Why are you being so difficult? Do you not understand that a father has just as much right to parent the child as you do? He probably did the simplest thing he could when you divorced and due to the age of the children at the time, it was practical...but the kids aren't "babies" anymore, their toddlers and almost preschoolers. As their ages increase so should the time they spend with their father.
If you were critical of him and his right to parent right when the kids were born, it would explain why he so quickly agreed to such little.
I can only imagine how you come off to him in your communication...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jada
Platinum
**

Reged: 06/02/07
Posts: 3501
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213551 - 06/20/08 05:59 PM (69.115.64.195)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

You said:

Demand #1: Joint legal custody. Our response: No way Jose. The main reason for this is because when we first got divorced, he gave that up pretty readily. And since then, he's let the girls take pete's last name, which pretty clearly indicates he is okay with schools, doctors, etc not readily recognizing him as a father...and therefore wasn't anticipating trying to get involved in those aspects of his life. He is pretty irresponsible and since I'm the one who is going to miss work when they're sick, etc, so I feel I've earned the right to be the primary decision maker. We wouldn't have had more children if we'd thought he'd have the ability to weigh in on decisions (like what religion they are) that would undoubtedly affect our new son too.

My response:

This is something that he will get. And IS in the children's best interest.

You said:
Demand #2: Have his weekend start Friday at 5pm instead of Saturday at 8am. Our response: No, no, no.


My response:

This he will get. It's not unreasonable. It's not like he is asking for every week-end.

You said:

Demand #3: Have us share in the transportation. We said fine. He can pick them up 8am our house on Saturday, and me or Pete can pick them up at 5pm his house on Sunday (which shaves time off his visitation) because we would need to get them home in time to feed them and bathe them before bedtime.

My response:

That's not unreasonable, except that he will be picking them up on Friday (the judge will give him the full week-end, not just what you want him to have).

You said:


Demand #4: He said he wanted time on either the 24th, 25th, or 26th of December. We said, sure, you can have them from noon until 6pm on the 26th.

My response:

Your response is completely unreasonable and unfair. And won't be ordered by a judge. A judge will order ALL major holidays to be split. Get used to it.

You said:


The reasoning behind this is when we were divorced, he gave me the entire Christmas break holiday with the ability to visit the children in my home on Christmas day (which he has never exercised). And, I had more children based on the agreement we were already following. I wouldn't have had a third child if I thought he was going to be waking up on his own on Christmas morning. Granted I only celebrate the pagan aspects of holidays, but there is still a lot of fun traditions associated with them. I've got pretty fond memories of going out shopping for door busters on the day after Christmas with my mom, too. They are girls, they should have that.

My response:

And they can have that when it is your turn to have them. He is their father and he gets to share his families traditions with them, as well.

You said:

Demand #5: He said he wanted them during Christmas and winter breaks (end of February) every year. We said, you can have them for Dec 27th-29th on one year, and then 3 days during Winter break (excluding Nash's birthday) the following year. We're already at 4 1/2 extra days a now.

My response:

The judge will order them to be split. He will get them for the first half of the December break (yes, he will get them on Christmas, and Christmas Eve as well) every other year, on those years, you will have them the last half of the December break. Again, this is something that a judge will order.

You said:


This only provides him with 2 extra overnights a year, which is a good thing for me to keep limited if he takes me to court again.

My response:

If you tell a judge that, you may lose custody. This isn't about limiting his time, this is about doing what is best for the kids.

You said:

Demand #6: To claim the children on the tax exemptions every other year. Our response: hahaha.

My response:

This isn't an unreasonable request and one a judge will order.

You said:

Demand #7: To have the children's social security numbers. Our response: No, no, no.


My response:

As their father, he has the right to have their social security numbers. And a judge will order you to give it to him.

You said:

Demand #8: To rotate every other Easter and Thanksgiving. My response: I want them their birthdays, their half-brother's b-day, My husband's birthday, my birthday, Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter, 4th of July, St Patrick's day, Halloween, and Valentine's day, and mother's day. If his weekend falls on one of these, he gets the next two weekends in a row (so I'm not getting any extra days by having these and they don't normally fall on a weekend anyway). He gets: Memorial day, Father's day, Columbus Day, Veteran's Day, Labor Day, and Martin Luther King day from 8am until 6pm. These always fall on Mondays, which he has never had before, so for him it's pure "extra" days.

My response:

A judge will either order the kids' birthday to be split (along with the holidays, you don't get to pick the ones you get all of the time like you want to do), either they are with him one year and you the next or the day is split between the two of you. I suggest you get used to sharing his kids with him. Because what he is asking for isn't unreasonable and will be granted by a judge.

You said:

I wouldn't have had a third child if I thought he was going to be hunting for easter eggs on his own on easter morning.

My response:

The fact that you have a third child is irrelevant. Your ex is their father and has every right to holidays, too. And you will be ordered to share them. Whether you like it or not.

You said:

I have taken both the girls to the Macy's parade every year since they've been born (Harper has been to four).

My response:

And you can continue to take them when it is your turn to have them for that holiday.

You said:


When it comes to things like Halloween and 4th of July, when they are older their friends (who undoubtedly will live near me) will have halloween parties or want to trick or treat together and I don't want them to miss out.

My response:

There is no reason for them to miss out. Their father can take them to these parties, take their friends trick or treating with him. Either the ones in your area or the ones in his area. Again, you aren't going to have a choice in the matter. You will have to share ALL of the holidays.

You said:
Demand #9: To have me "return" a bunch of personal paperwork of his that I never had (primarily because he never had it either). Why would I have a copy of his dad's death certificate if he never did?

My response:

Simply tell him you don't have it. It is up to him to prove that you do. And if he can, you will be in trouble for lying to the courts.

You said:


Demand #10: To tell him if we're going to move. The last time I checked, we were legally obligated to do that anyway. And, we'd have a good enough reason to move he wouldn't be able to stop us anyway, so sure, why not.

My response:

Just an FYI, you can't move without his or the courts permission. Well, you can, but the kids stay.

You said:

Demand #11: To not allow the girls to call my husband "Dad" and to force the girls to call their biological father "dad." Our response: HAHAHA. He has raised them since they were 2 months and 20 months old. He has earned the title.

My response:

Your husband is not Dad. Their father is.

You said:

Demand #12: To have first right of refusal. So, let's say I'm away because I'm traveling for business or personal reasons. That means if he fancies, he can come take the kids away and keep them at his house (even if it means pulling them out of school for a week or having his girlfriend watch them the majority of the time). Our response: You must be kidding. If this is the type of crap you pull after you get jealous cuz I go to NZ, we are never doing anything where we have to notify you of where I am.

My response:

This isn't unreasonable and will be granted by a judge.


I read the rest of your post.

If this goes to court, you are going to lose. What he is asking for is STANDARD visitation. And he IS going to get it.

Personally, if I were you, I would save the legal fees and just agree. You are being unreasonable and the court will see that.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jersey girl
Platinum
**

Reged: 08/07/06
Posts: 1646
Re: going back to court: [Re: mistake#2]
      #213573 - 06/20/08 10:37 PM (71.201.60.237)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

OK - as you can see - your post is not hitting anyone very well. And let me add that the people responding are custodial parents, so if you can't get us to agree with you, we are your most sympathetic audience.

Here are some realities:
- Your ex is going to get visitation at a FAR greater amount than you would want him to. You are FAR better off agreeing in mediation than you are in court.
- The holidays are non negotiable to most courts - you are going to lose the more inflexible you are.

Your 10 min rules - not going to fly. Start thinking 30 min. No one is going to allow him to lose additional visitation without due process - think innocent until proven guilty.

If he is paying child support regularly - he is going to get the tax deductions - sorry - just a reality.

If you go in front of a judge with the black/white attitude you have now - you will lose far more than you expect - your positions are unsympathetic.

I know this is not what you want to hear, but you are better off hearing it before you are told it in a court order.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
1227
Gold
***

Reged: 09/12/07
Posts: 195
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213614 - 06/21/08 02:51 AM (64.81.150.197)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

At first I thought wow what a jerk, until I realized original order was only 2yrs ago and the kids were so young. Totally see y he agreed w/ exception of name change. Kids were too young for longer vis. divorce cost a lot and he probably got some bad counsel and lastly I am sure you bullied him as u r trying now. Which is probably y he went w/ dcfs route since it would not be out of his pocket, although wrong for doing it. I assume he was desperate. You are unreasonable 99%.
Joint custody he should get as their father he HAS a relationship w/ them. As for you taking them to the doctor or taking off when they are sick offer him the option to be involved as well. Switch off
Get off your new son case***your daughters relationship w/ their father should have nothing to do w/ your son. Why should they be penalized bc they have a 1/2 brother? No judge will allow that. As for you would not have had a 3rd child if you would have known their father/daughter relationship would have change is a LOAD. As much as you may have planned your son it was not based on your daughters father.
Before I go further ask yourself do you love your son more than your daughters?
Demand #2 they are 2 and 3 if they have homework you need to change their preschool. Maybe he did not know if he could handle the girls longer than a day and half before and now realizes he can---you should be thankful he loves his girls and did it that way instead of taking too much & needing to go backwards, not to mention it makes more sense now that he has them longer they are older. As for it interfering w/ xtra activities well he will have to take that responsibility as well, trust me games happen saturdays and sundays also. So what are u going to take those away? No he will have to participate and take them as well if it his wkend.
As for pu 5pm Sunday fine he will be getting them Friday 5pm fair and he should feed them bathe them and you just get them to bed by 8pm.
#4 Y should he not get the joys of holidays as well, 4get the court will give it to him anyway. Aren't the girls suppose to have the joy of his family as well? Won't your son get the joy of your current husband's family? He is their family and so is his family theirs you should not be allowed to take that away from him***u r extremely selfish and not for your girls sake. Exercise christmas in your home, please he probably agreed to this before you decided to get married so bc that changed so has his desire to have christmas at your home with your family and him be the outsider. When the kids were that lil that may have been reasonable, but not now, not later. So to get things straight your are allowed to change the circumstances, but he is not? O and I totally see how shopping is more important than spending the holiday w/ their dad. If that is the case give him 7pm the 24th to 7pm the 25th so you can have the 26th ready to shop w/ them. Why can't they go shopping with him? His mom? His future wife? I doubt the girls look forward to shopping on the 26th now, if they do later then maybe he will not be as unreasonable as you and allow them to go ahead w/ that tradition w/ grandma, but that should not determine the xmas holiday.
#6 taxes he gets on child you get the other. Let me ask you why have you not gave up child support so you can have your husband just be their dad? no you just want all the good without giving up anything.
#7SS# he should have it he IS THEIR DAD as much as you have lied to yourself that he is not. He will need it for the taxes anyway.
NO COURT in the world will give u stepdads bday or 1/2 brothers bday. You are lucky if your bday will make a difference and the girls bday will alternate like a holiday and when school becomes a problem bc he lives so far away then I am sure he will take them to dinner that evening by your home like 5-8 or whatever and that is it bc he is reasonable. But their bday's are to be treated like holidays and I hope you are not selfish and say he can take the bday girl, but not his other daughters so the girls can not spend their day together. I can totally see you doing that bc the order will probably be like dad bday on alternate yrs so since it is not the other then chances are he will not have a right to it, but you should be the unselfish mom that says take both bc they are sisters and should celebrate together.
Sure he is getting xtra days the ones that will be a bother to you when they start school and you have to either take off or find a sitter. How dare u I totally see y he gave in 2yrs ago. You are a calculating manipulator. O what about his bday? If you get yours he should get his well before stepdad gets his.
As for Macy parade etc, maybe he will b reasonable and say u know that is good for the girls go ahead I will take them after that. As for halloween he can entertain them in your neighborhood w/ their friends when they are older just like you will. o wait you would not want their friends to know they actually have a dad.
As for your son hunting for easter eggs well u can do it before they leave bc he will not have them before 8am anyway. This way they can have easter eggs w/ your kid ever holiday and their future 1/2 siblings from dad e/o. I think you get the best here.
I hope the girls call their dad dad, if they chose to call ur husband that then fine, but their dad is their dad and he loves them a lot more than ur husband ever will, i know that bc he has suffered from the start giving u full custody and allowing u to bully him for 2yrs.
Taking them for your vacation is not unreasonable allows them xtra time with their dad if it does not interfere w/ school. Grandparents do not have more rights then he does even if u would like. And you do not need to notify where you re going if it is some big secret. Just say going away these days u taking them or should I call my parents, ok thx. Remember the girlfriend may someday b stepmom and should have same rights as stepdad. Don't even come w/ he has been around since 20months or 2 months bc that sounds fishy to me. Why would u be w/ a man 2months after u gave birth 2 another mans child? Why should he be penalized bc you moved fast and he waited to continue with his life. why should he penalized bc he his marriage seriously while you took it as joke. Please you should respect him for that and be ashamed that you jumped in with another man so soon.
He should get 2 consecutive weeks.if he so choses why should u have so much control? You can tell him by april 1st I am taking these 2 weeks also, whoever says it in writing 1st gets it. The other weeks are fair game as long as they are not in school. If summer is his busy time then he should also be allowed to in writing by april 1st say I will forgo summer vacation and take it during winter or spring as long as it is not dec 24th or 25th.
Phone vis maybe hard at their age, but eventually it will be he can call when he wants and u can not prevent it and if you do he will ask the kids and the girls will say I did not get a message and you will be in contempt. The order will state REASONABLE phone visitation.
10minute pick up rule is ridiculous especially when you live an hour away and visitation will be Friday rush hour. It will be 1hr if he will be later he will need to call and you will have to be flexible and say ok u will be 65 minutes late no problem and yes this maybe that you, your husband and son will miss your reservation for dinner, but you will do it for your daughters and guess what you still have saturday night to go out. Things happen and you will need to work with it.
Veg diet was that what the kids had while you were married? or is this stepdads demands? you will probably need to explain this further.
He will be allowed to take the kids out of the state and will need to give you notice of when and where and you will have to do the same. Bc you will both have joint custody.
As for his friends in Seattle you will have to prove that he will but them in danger before that even goes on any order. Unreasonable is an understatement and I am a mom. I hope for the girls sake you were kidding about these controlling demands bc if you think this is reasonable you need to be stripped of custody all together bc you are putting a man (ur husband) above their dad.And you are putting your son above them. These are the kids that were forced out of their 2 parent home so accommodations should be made so they can enjoy the holidays and be with both parents. If it means waking up earlier christmas to open gifts on the yrs he goes with them or u having to save some of yours son gifts so he can open it with them when they get home then you will have to do that. Just like he will have to. Remember they are 50% him and 50% you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MommaMia
Platinum
*

Reged: 02/17/07
Posts: 376
Re: going back to court: [Re: 1227]
      #213647 - 06/21/08 10:54 AM (74.243.6.83)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

To be very honest, I think your ex will get almost all of his demands if this goes before a judge.

I do not think you are acting in the best interests of your children, you are acting in you own best interests and the "new family".

Raise your expectations, give him a chance to be a good father. It's not like he has been gone for many years. You post reeks of entitlement and resentment. You may have good reason for that, but it should not affect your daughters.

As a divorced mom of a 3 year old, whose father is FAR from perfect, I still find your post very sad. Try to change your mind set, it is your girls who will benefit.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ssrachel
Platinum
***

Reged: 05/23/07
Posts: 2084
Loc: a better place :)
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213839 - 06/22/08 08:43 AM (72.82.181.201)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

you're quite the control freak, huh?

--------------------
What you reap is what you sow and so it goes...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ttina
Platinum
***

Reged: 02/28/08
Posts: 398
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213850 - 06/22/08 11:05 AM (205.188.117.143)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

How very honorable of you to "allow" your girls see their father at all. Ohhh and to have the stipulation of the girls being constantly at your home/activities in order to have your son. Your girls will really appriciate how hard you worked to keep them to yourself and away from such a horrid man that you once were married to. Your such a great mommy.

Ohhhh BTW.... in case you did not get the tone.... the previous post is dripping with sarcasm.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jersey girl
Platinum
**

Reged: 08/07/06
Posts: 1646
Re: going back to court: [Re: ttina]
      #213862 - 06/22/08 12:33 PM (217.37.109.17)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

So, 123 - I am betting you are very sorry you ever posted here. And that would be sad, because we are usually pretty helpful.

Here are some additional observations:
- If you tell a judge that he has never used Christmas visition, his lawyer is going to talk about your controlling the situation to the point that the father could not build a relationship at all.
- If you talk about not wanting him to have vacations - the other lawyer is going to talk about how many nights he has missed with his children.

If he hires a good lawyer, and you do anything even close to the above in writing - you will lose a lot. What most CP have been accused of is being controlling and judges get very crazy on that issue.


Do not answer his request directly. Go through a lawyer. And listen to that person. They are going to give you perspective.

I know this is scary. You are going from 100% to less than and your kids will have an adjustment period. But he is their dad and you have to let him be the dad - on his own turf. You can't control it.

Things you can control:
- Forfeited time is not made up. Write that in the agreement.
- Father has to have a bedroom for the girls.
- Father has to have car seats.

Controlling the environment for them from a safety stand point is something people will support. Putting in reasonable time frames for notice, etc. is something that is supported.

Think about joint custody. It sounds like a huge battle to lose= but it isn't. It means major decisions only like private vs public school. Changing religion.

If he steps up, your daughters win. If he doesn't, it doesn't hurt you and your daughters are young enough to not really get as impacted.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
msty
Platinum
**

Reged: 11/16/07
Posts: 221
Re: going back to court: [Re: one1two2three3]
      #213873 - 06/22/08 01:34 PM (70.171.219.199)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

My two cents, for what it is worth...
I think it is sad he readily gave up his parental rights at a time he should have ensured his role in his children's lives.
I know divorce sucks and it sounds like he was kind of a selfish dick in the first place, but he is their dad.
Your husband is their stepdad.
As their biological father, who wants to take his rightful place in their lives, he should.
You are their mother, but you are not their only parent. And if he wants to spend more time with them, just let him.
The ten minutes thing is a little hardcore.
In order to get what is best for the girls, go to a mediator and try to compromise on parenting time. I think alternating holidays (major holidays like Christmas and Easter and Thanksgiving) is what is right. It may not be in YOUR best interest, but it is in the children's.
Claiming you only had a third child because he would have other siblings to spend holidays with is lame. You have more kids not because you plan how all your holidays will be, but because you want more kids.
I'm sorry you have to go through this, but the girls should have their dad in their lives. You can be the bigger person and help nurture that relationship because it will be better for them in the long run to have a father who takes an active role in their lives. Your new husband cannot replace their father no matter how much you want him to.
Seriously, I know it sucks. But just like you said, they should know their grandparents, and what about his family?

--------------------
Everything now is as it should be.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mistake#2
Platinum
***

Reged: 07/19/06
Posts: 3268
Loc: Florida
Re: going back to court: [Re: Jada]
      #213892 - 06/22/08 04:29 PM (24.94.123.111)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

I wonder if this wasn't a test?
The poster hasn't been back to defend their position...or to make any further comments or clarification.

Interesting also how the posters that replied are CP's and some that have abusive ex's or at least major problem ex's yet aren't jaded to the right that both parents should have in their childrens lives.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jada
Platinum
**

Reged: 06/02/07
Posts: 3501
Re: going back to court: [Re: mistake#2]
      #213925 - 06/22/08 08:31 PM (69.115.64.195)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

[quote]I wonder if this wasn't a test?
The poster hasn't been back to defend their position...or to make any further comments or clarification.

Interesting also how the posters that replied are CP's and some that have abusive ex's or at least major problem ex's yet aren't jaded to the right that both parents should have in their childrens lives. [/quote]

Interesting, isn't it?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ssrachel
Platinum
***

Reged: 05/23/07
Posts: 2084
Loc: a better place :)
Re: going back to court: [Re: mistake#2]
      #213928 - 06/22/08 08:34 PM (72.82.181.201)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

i know my reply was a bit sarcastic, but even i have almost 50/50 custody with a man who participated in about 5% (that is no exaggeration) of the girls' lives when we are married. even now, it is his gf who does the majority of the interaction, not him. i still can't deny him his right to be a father.

interesting is right.

--------------------
What you reap is what you sow and so it goes...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Determined_Dad
Silver


Reged: 02/02/07
Posts: 92
Re: going back to court: [Re: ssrachel]
      #214136 - 06/23/08 01:43 PM (64.90.25.125)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

I can understand where 123 would be coming from. I mean, she's basically raised 2 kids for the past 10 years w/out the help of the father. I can see how she would be defensive and even scared that he's making these demands. Unfortunally for her, she's given a response without taking a look at the complete picture. Having the father make these "demands" could be a wonderful thing. That means he wants to take part in his children's lives. That's great for them! I hope it all works out.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jada
Platinum
**

Reged: 06/02/07
Posts: 3501
Re: going back to court: [Re: Determined_Dad]
      #214201 - 06/23/08 05:58 PM (69.115.64.195)
Edit post Edit   Reply to this post Reply   Reply to this post Quote   Quick Reply Quick Reply  

[quote]Unfortunally for her, she's given a response without taking a look at the complete picture. [/quote]

You may want to go and re-read her posts. Her kids aren't even 10 years old and she said nothing about the father not exercising the parenting time that he does have.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)


Previous topic Previous   View all topics Index   Next topic Next   Threaded Mode Threaded  

Extra information
0 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:   

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is disabled

Rating:
Topic views: 947

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Divorce Support Forums

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.2