gigi
Platinum
 
Reged: 11/06/06
Posts: 5052
|
|
Oh hey, lots of people in the negotiating phases want to make suer they get more than their due if something happens to the ex. My husband's ex was trying to demand that he keep a huge life insurance policy on himself payable to her if he ever passed away... like, 100 times more than she'd EVER get grand total if all the things he owed to her were paid in a lump sum. if he could FIND someone who would insure him to that amount, it would have been crazy expensive. He & I had just met when she was talking about this and I was a bit freaked out about it... like she was planning to kill him for the insurance or something... He had just kind of asked me, "gee, this sounds odd"... as if he was maybe considering actually AGREEING to it... All I could think of was all those people who die during divorce proceedings or soon after ... or disappear and are presumed dead... and their spouses or former spouses collect HUGE insurance checks... and of course are the biggest suspects in their murders... It was downright creepy. I think her lawyer tried to tell her that. By the time she switched to her third lawyer, I get the feeling she understood that she was never going to get to become a million-heiress just by having her ex die, because she stopped demanding that and was just holding the children hostage instead.
Sigh... the things people think up when they're getting divorced... if they couldn't become a millionaire with a life of leisure while married, they want to figure out a way to make that happen through the divorce... Some people are just nuts.
I think the real question with WWIL though is not whether or nto he names her as beneficiary, but whether she will name him or any heirs he may get. She's been disabled for 8 years since the accidents and has not complied with physical therapy properly so that instead of recovering as her docs say she should have done, she ahs gone downhill and her psychological situation seems to have gone downhill with it. People who do that to themselves are chopping thier lives down by HUGE numbers of years, so... barring a freak accident, she is likely to pass away well before the entitlement to a pension even starts... not to be cruel about it, but his presence in her life, constantly picking up for her, organizing things, thinking and doing the work of running the household, even buying her junk food and cigarettes, playing nursemaid when she needs it... it has been holding her back and is probably slowly killing her.
I've seen couples like this before... something happens and one member of the couple starts realizing they like the attention they get from being sick, so they have no incentive to STOP being sick. The other member feels like a charitable and good person by being the caretaker, so they allow it to continue, and by the time one or the other is fed up or bored or drifted so far apart emotionally that it won't work... well... the sick one has a much bigger hole to dig themselves out of, sad to say. Given the situation they're in, she's kind of nutty to be negotiating for a big piece of the pension... if she gets it, her fair half, through a QDRO, it seems she'll never get it... and getting that will probably mean she gets LESS value out of the house, cars, hot tub, etc.
Given the likelihood that she'll be gone before the entitlement kicks in 20+ years from now, WWIL would be smart to negotaite for her to take her fair half of the pension so that he'd have to give her LESS of a lump sum equalizing payment on all the other STUFF he wants... because he sure wants to keep all the STUFF.
|
What will I lose
Platinum
Reged: 05/21/07
Posts: 739
Loc: PA
|
|
[quote] Given the likelihood that she'll be gone before the entitlement kicks in 20+ years from now, WWIL would be smart to negotaite for her to take her fair half of the pension so that he'd have to give her LESS of a lump sum equalizing payment on all the other STUFF he wants... because he sure wants to keep all the STUFF. [/quote]
actually i was hoping to sign away more of my pension for many reasons
1. i'm young and can build it up again.
2. since she said she wouldnt be around, more pension to her really isn't a 'giveaway' as much as it will be if i have to come up with $$$ today
3. if i do sign away more pension in return for less cash now and she does live that long, it will benefit her MORE than the money now...sorta
4 as mentioned before, i really would prefer just to pay her out of the pension I get instead of segregating the pension itself. Seems like i get more tax break for it and easier to transfer etc if she does die
does pension paid to her count as alimony for me so i can deduct it?
-------------------- call me WWIL...PA resident 39 year old , married 11 years, together 12...splitting in 13th year.
|
golightly
Gold

Reged: 04/10/07
Posts: 141
|
|
I think you're confusing alimony (based on inocome) and the cash flow from an asset (your "pension"). Your pension is an asset, similar to your house - except that you cannot "sell" your pension and get cash now for it.
Think of it this way: If you were to purchase a perpetual fixed annuity by paying into it for a certain # of years. (This is basically an investment contract by which in exchange for your paying into it, or investing a lump sum, it agrees to pay you $X per month starting at some point in the future, until you die. This future stream of cash flows (the monthly pension you will receive when you reach a certain age) has a current lump-sum value. It is an asset. In theory, if you had it today, you could invest this lump sum into one of the above-described complex annuity contracts, and it would pay you out a certain amount in the future.
There are complex formulas that can be used to figure out what your future pension is worth in lump-sum terms today, and this is what you owe half of to your soon to be ex.
Your employer may be able to give you some guidance as to what this is worth today, or you could consult a financial advisor and/or insurance person.
Note: The way most pensions work is that the longer you work for a company, the more you get in your monthly payment. If you have worked for them for a number of years, you are likely "vested" at a certain amount, meaning you get this even if you quit. It is only this amount that she is entitled to half of. If you continue to work for the same employer for the next 15-20 years, you would get a higher monthly payment. It is silly to think she would be entitled to half of that, as a good portion of it would relate to services rendered for years after your divorce.
It really is in your best interests to "lump sum" her - even if it means paying out a little more of your 401K.
Another thing to consider - what's happening all over is that employers are getting out of pensions they promised employees. They in essence "buy out" the employee's interests and invest the funds in 401k's. Yes, this has even happened to state employees in some areas. The last thign you want is to get a big lump of cash some day in the future, and have her show up to claim half at that point! Or worse, owe her some previously promised amount monthly once you retire....
|
What will I lose
Platinum
Reged: 05/21/07
Posts: 739
Loc: PA
|
|
[quote]I think you're confusing alimony (based on inocome) and the cash flow from an asset (your "pension"). Your pension is an asset, similar to your house - except that you cannot "sell" your pension and get cash now for it.[/quote]
no not confusing them at all. Someone else suggested it may be better for me to pay her what the pension normally would pay her upon my retirement instead of actually signing over the pension to her. This would be for ease of transition of the pension back to me if she dies before i retire.
so for example if her part of the pension she would get from the state is 100 a month, today id write up an agreement that upon retiring, i would pay her 100 per month.
so my question is, if i do it this way, can i count the 100 as alimony since i am paying her cash.
[quote] It really is in your best interests to "lump sum" her - even if it means paying out a little more of your 401K. [/quote]
i know you can remember all my details but you cannot take any money from a state pension EVER. and i dont have a 401k at all. And the little Roth that i do have i dont even know if i can legally take out that much and the total value is only 7K today...hardly a drop compared to my pension.
[quote] Another thing to consider - what's happening all over is that employers are getting out of pensions they promised employees. They in essence "buy out" the employee's interests and invest the funds in 401k's. Yes, this has even happened to state employees in some areas. The last thign you want is to get a big lump of cash some day in the future, and have her show up to claim half at that point! Or worse, owe her some previously promised amount monthly once you retire.... [/quote]
I'm truly lost by your statement. If today both parties agree that the pension would be 100 a month when i retire (the part she is legally entitled to), what in the legal world could change that amount? She will only ever have been married to me for 13 years and that wont ever change. So even if that improbable thing you said about buying out does happen, i do not understand how that would make what she 'made' during the marriage change and change our legal agreement? She's owed X dollars period. End of story. If an actuary figures it out today and everyone agrees, i am sure that cant be changed.
-------------------- call me WWIL...PA resident 39 year old , married 11 years, together 12...splitting in 13th year.
|
bottleguru
New
Reged: 12/13/07
Posts: 9
|
|
Ya wierd,But I found this interesting,I am going thru division of marital assets,and the pension is in the equasion,so,noing if I am not intitaled to it if in fact he is diseased before or during I can collect is important in the case.
|
What will I lose
Platinum
Reged: 05/21/07
Posts: 739
Loc: PA
|
|
talked to my atty..she said it appears i DO get the pension back if my wife dies but we need to confirm that with the regulators. And she said it's not worth the trouble and my wife probably wouldnt accept me paying her the amount of retirement as regular alimony anyway.
so after she gets this split she will write up the qdro for my wife
-------------------- call me WWIL...PA resident 39 year old , married 11 years, together 12...splitting in 13th year.
|
|