stephenp
New
Reged: 06/12/08
Posts: 5
|
|
My wife and I have been seperated for over three months, and I have filed for divorce around 2 months ago. During this time we have made contact with each other and had sex. She insist that since this happened that she could have the whole divorce thrown out and I would have to start all over. Something along the lines of reconciliation. Is there any truth to this or not? I am in Alabama btw.
|
KGrow
Platinum

Reged: 01/27/06
Posts: 3153
Loc: Colorado
|
|
She's probably bluffing. There are some interesting laws on the books though. If she's not bluffing, she's going to have to have a witness and/or evidence to make it stick. Was anyone else there during relations?
|
tiredofnagging
Gold
Reged: 05/09/08
Posts: 190
Loc: Las Vegas, NV USA
|
|
[quote]My wife and I have been seperated for over three months, and I have filed for divorce around 2 months ago. During this time we have made contact with each other and had sex. She insist that since this happened that she could have the whole divorce thrown out and I would have to start all over. Something along the lines of reconciliation. Is there any truth to this or not? I am in Alabama btw. [/quote]
I'm no expert other than the little head does get the big head in trouble. I'm sure the ladies will have a ball with that one.
Seriously, if you've filed for divorce and had sex with her, there must be more than meets the eye. Not cool.
-------------------- This Too Shall Pass
|
theanswerguy
Platinum
 
Reged: 04/12/07
Posts: 2312
|
|
If you filed for divorce under fault grounds ( like adultery ) , a resumption of the martial relationship would be considered condonation and nullify the fault . You can " bump uglies " whenever you like if the divorce was filed due to incompatibility .
-------------------- Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right. Isaac Asimov
|
stephenp
New
Reged: 06/12/08
Posts: 5
|
|
Yes it was filed under irreconcilably differences
|
stoltz
Platinum

Reged: 01/29/07
Posts: 1494
Loc: Texas
|
|
As long as the "irreconsciliable differences" had nothing to do with sex, I don't see the issue. But as others said, laws can get pretty freaky about it. Call her bluff and see.
|