ttina
Platinum
 
Reged: 02/28/08
Posts: 398
|
|
Even in a nuclear family there is room for one child to do things another cannot. Every child needs that special time with the parent. We don't let the kids do the same extra curricular activities because they need to find their individual selves... a self that is seperate and independant of the other kids. It is still balanced b/c they each get an activity at a time, just one does guitar, one does karate, one does cheer. Alot of it has to do with age and intrest and quite frankly money.
There is a balance and the child needs to feel they have value in the family, whether or not that means going on family vacays or having their name or initials tattooed on the skin of those who love them. DH's children aren't my flesh and blood and they never will be. I love them for the people they are. I have thought about having son's name tattooed on me, but I do not want all three on me (can't think of a way to make it look right and not like a "list") So I do not have Son's name on me. It isn't that I don't love Son with all my heart, it is that I respect little man and little girl and how being excluded would feel to them... cause being a parent you learn it isn't about you, it is about the kids.
|
aplover7
New
Reged: 03/15/08
Posts: 5
Loc: Texas
|
|
Hi pooh--- in answer to the tat question.... after a long battle with myself to even GET a tat, I started with a Small feather on my shoulder. Later I decided to get another out of pure love, and out of just missing my kids. I Wanted to have mine "with me" all the time. So I went and had ALL my kids names placed on each side and top and bottom sorted by age, or first born. Yea my Bio Daughter got mad to see SD name on me, but hey I told her I have accepted her as my own, so deal with it.She has. I also had my current wifes name place on my other shoulder. These are "personal" tats. No one sees them unless at beach or pool. Like I said it was done out of LOVE, and now I have then with me ALWAYS, no matter the distance that seperates us.
|
maggiethecat
New
Reged: 06/10/08
Posts: 8
|
|
May i offer a different perspective? My dad was remarried when i was 5. My stepbrother was 2 months younger than i. We both got the same amount spent on us at Christmas etc. So that wasn't an issue. The problem was that the rules were really quite different. In that if i stepped over the line my dad reigned me in. But if my stepbrother did the same thing, my stepmom ran interference. I found out when i was older that my stepbrother was spying on me and telling my stepmom. If i didn't do something wrong, he'd make it up. So i was often in trouble for things i didn't do. Dad caught onto this when i was about 13 or 14.
I wanted to be close to my stepmom when i was young and be accepted by her, but it became apparent to me that i'd never live up to her son in her eyes. I suppose that's natural in a way, but on the other hand, you shouldn't have to drag one child down so that the other looks good, ya know?
My stepmom and i are on really good terms now. And have been for the last 8 or 9 years (i'm 36). But i believe that has alot to do with my stepbrothers death (he died when we were 25). If he were still around i think things would still be very strained and she wouldn't have been able to open up to me. I'm very lucky to have the relationship i have with her now. It is one of the blessings i count daily.
Coming from this perspective, i think that all things should be equal. period. If you're commited to the marriage, then you're commited to the children. And everyone is equal. You can't control what goes on at BM's house, so don't try. You CAN control what goes on in your home. And if you're fair and equal, and loving and accepting, that is what your children and your stepchildren will remember. And maybe your kids will feel more like siblings than step siblings. just my two cents.
|
thesecondwife
Silver
Reged: 06/01/08
Posts: 53
|
|
The main difference in our house vs my step-son's house, is that fact that in his he is the only child. In ours he has siblings that are much younger. Although father and son do a lot of one on one stuff together, I know he feels like the third wheel around our children (despite our best efforts). Also, there is the fact that he doesn't get everything he wants (even when the throws a full fledged temper-tantrum). Our children know they have to share, they have to ask for snack, and that coke is treat not a regular drink. He is used to having the latest and greatest toys, a pool in his backyard, and not having to compete for attention. That is why my husband tries to do visits with him where he lives. They get plenty of one on one time. Sadly, though step-son doesn't appreciate that fact. Maybe one day he will.
|
ttina
Platinum
 
Reged: 02/28/08
Posts: 398
|
|
We have the difference in only child and age difference in our home too. But our reality is opposite of yours. My son, 14, has stepped right into the older brother role for little man, 10, and little girl,7. Just the other night little girl had a nosebleed... it was an impressive one too. Son was running around, finding washcloths, cleaning her feet where blood had splattered, offering to clean her bathroom, and showing deep concern. Son watches the little ones over the summer break. Son shares his "stuff" with them and gets their help in acting out the movies he writes. That is not to say that Son doesn't utilize alone time.... he knows how to close his door to them and say "no" to them when they knock. While neither home has massive amounts of luxuries, son has more of a home with us and more of a man cave at his father's.
In our home, we do not play "food police" where the kids have to ask for snacks and such, but they also know that if they didn't finish the previous meal they do not have the choice of snacks. The kids also know we buy walmart sprite, and they are fine with that. One prefers sweet tea over soda and the others go about 50/50 with lemonade and milk. The thing is, it is difficult for a child who is used to being the only child to be thrown into a household with other children. The child isn'tbeing greedy or thoughless when he goes and gets a snack without asking, this is how he was taught from early childhood. He may take material things for granted, but there again, this is how he was taught by his experiences. An only child is more likely to get more "stuff" because it is easier to buy for one and with one, there is the higher likelyhood that the child will be out and about with the parent.
Children are notorious for not appreciating what their parents do for them. And to a point they shouldn't have to think... wow... mom/dad really went over and above to get me a new pair of shoes.... the child should be able to depend on having shoes that fit. Children should also be able to take for granted a parent's love.... to have them question that love would mean that something has happened that has shaken them to their foundation.
|
golightly
Gold

Reged: 04/10/07
Posts: 141
|
|
I wrestle with the "equal" issue all the time. Got a stepson 16 living with us full time, and 2 small ones (3 & 4) that are ours. Stepson has had a roller coaster these past few years. His mom was married to a man who made a lot of money for about 5 years. They are recently divorced. Beloved (Ha!) Stepdad has not attempted to contact son since mom moved out. Kid has seen his mom twice in 18 months. She is unemployed and very ill, mentally & physically. We have heard she is living off the charity of an old friend at this point. Any way, here is where I wrestle with "equality." Stepkid lived in the lap of luxe for 5+ years where the word "no" was never uttered. Both this kid and his older brother have been told that, of course, they would have private college wherever they wanted, since they were young. Whenever their dad tried to "butt in" with his two cents, he was told that his opinions were not needed. And while stepdad was playing "daddy," they even told my husband his money wouldn't be needed. Well, now one is in college, the other will go in a year, and we are footing 100% of the bill. We sent older one to private school for 1st year, and told him that he had that year to wrangle himself some grants/ scholarships etc. He has not done so, so we are forcing him to transfer. I'm sad, because he did well there, but we're in that financial spot where we can't afford the tuition, but make too much to qualify for aid. I feel particularly bad, because if his dad & I were not married, he would get fin aid, b/c dad makes no money. Anyway, back to my bio kids. My mother has set up educational funds for them. I am also saving vigorously for them. (Note - I saved for my stepkids, too, but I was the only one out of all four parents saving, and I wasn't in their lives long enough for it to add up to more than $25k or so for each). Education has always been extremely important to my family. (It's important to my husband, too, but he's a little late to this party where his older boys are concerned) So, of course my own kids will get what is being denied my stepkids. Stepkids already know about this money, as Grandma is also paying their private primary school tuition (lucky me!). My mother has never offered to help with my stepkids education. They have a good relationship with her, but she does not "approve" of them, because although they are basically good kids, they are not exceptional students, so private school would be wasted on them. I don't feel this way, but just don't have the money. For my own kids, I'm making sure I'll have the money (including Grandma's contribution)
My mother has strange relationships with my half-siblings (her stepkids), and I've tried so hard to keep that ickiness out of my family. For instance, my mother has paid for her step-grandkids to go to college. But, unbeknonst to my half-siblings, she has paid for it out of the trust fund she manages that was to be my siblings' inheritance. Any thoughts on how we can keep things "equal" in this scenario? My half-siblings resent me tremendously because I got the Ivy college while they went State U. (They conveniently forget that I had straight A's while they had straight C's) I don't want to create that in my current family. But it seems plus ca change....
|
alizzie007
New
Reged: 04/29/08
Posts: 15
|
|
I think the equality thing goes not only in step-families, but in families (like mine) where I have two siblings that are a lot younger than me (10 and 16 years younger). My parents could not afford any college for me, but they are already saving for my brothers. I don't resent them for it, and I want them to be very successful.
I also am facing the "equality" issue, because my SS is the same age as my youngest brother. I'm having a hard time changing my role of big-sister where I can spend a lot of fun days with my younger brother (slumber parties filled with pizza, ice cream, movies, etc.) to Step-Mom. I realized how much I let my brother get away with b/c my mom was the one doing the discipline, and now I am enforcing rules that I didn't with my brother because, well, I was the fun big sister.
We are all learning, though, right? I'll get there someday. *sigh*
-------------------- "I am not afraid. I was born to do this..."
|
duke
Bronze
Reged: 07/15/08
Posts: 32
Loc: Minn
|
|
Well speeking as step kid and, step dad do you love her as your own? as you may, treat her the same and love her the same as if she was your own kid. Stand up for your self and her..be the parent
|
|