In reading the decree of 7/32/2003, I ran across an item that I had previously overlooked and has recently been pointed out to me, much to my consternation. After stating the support payments will be distributed to the child at age 18 if they attend school pursuant to ORS 107.108, it says: "If support is ordered for more than one child, the order will be a "class order"; meaning the court ordered amount will remain the same until the LAST (capped, bolded and underlined)child is no longer eligible for support". Is this a typo? or does it really mean that as each child (there are four) turns 18 and goes to school, I must pay them their share (1/4) of the support and continue to pay the original support amount. So, this means, that as my x's expenses decrease due to children turning 18, she in effect receives more money for her living expenses. Is this really what it says? I need help from someone in the know. Thanks
Mine says the same. Not sure how youre support is figured but mine is currently being argued for the 2nd time I thought 166 a month was a little low for two teenage boys it was raised to 245 he argued then raised to 586. he is still arguing. If the amount is low then it probably isnt fair as a couple hundered for 2 kids isnt enough then the custodial will make out better in then end, If it is reasonable then it isnt fair to the non custodial to keep paying say 7= 8 hundred for one or 2 kids.Thing arent always fair in a divorce .
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
