i agree with chatterbox. having csp involved in my own little world, i can say there needs to be VERY tough and almost concrete evidence to take a child from a parent or to prevent a child from being given even supervised visits.
Usually they err on the side of caution towards the PARENTS. and the dividing line on abuse is pretty specific for the children to be removed.
Im not sure, but somehow, i think there MUST be more to this story that we are being told.
If it was ONLY adult men and teenage girls in the abusive senarios then probably only those girls would be removed, or those girls would have to stay only with their moms. Or some such senario. BUT, to remove ALL the kids? little ones? boys and girls?
i dont know.
there HAS to be more to this for csp to make such a choice. especially when you consider the publicity and the number of children involved.
It must not be just the potential abuse of older men to teenage girls. I really think there is much more to this.