HE does not work at a restaurant my daughter's friend does.He had a management job in sales. I never said he was intentionally losing jobs-I SAID HE QUIT-big difference.
My kids are not starving because I TAKE CARE OF THEM (with some help from my family). He knows I would never let that happen. In fact, he relies upon it.
The "evidence"-if there is any DOES NOT prove he was laid off. All I know is he had over 100k (part from me) and he has nothing to show for it. Plus he was ordered to hand over his income documentation-so I know exactly what he earned.
The point of my question was to find out if it matters in the eyes of the court whether he quit or was laid off. That simple.
And, yes, he is a louse. If you had been married to him I am sure you would agree. Not everything in life is "logical".