"..it's a dirty tactic and I'd never suggest it. Just like I think it's nasty when a woman accuses a man of domestic violence for the same purpose..."
But you don't think it's a "dirty tactic", that you would "never suggest", for everything a man has worked for all his life to be given to his wife, by law, because the judge in the case is constipated? Don't ask me again what I mean, Gigi. A person who claims to be as "learned in the law" as you do obviously knows the answer very well, and your feigning of ignorance and "playing dumb" are all too transparent. In the unlikely event that you really still don't have a clue, follow the links I have already sent you or posted in the "mens'rights" forum.
Isn't it curious that, as with children, adults who have the least to say speak the most, and vise-versa?